Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature Request: Ability to run arp-scan on multiple interfaces #19

Open
mmchu opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Feature Request: Ability to run arp-scan on multiple interfaces #19

mmchu opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
@pucherot
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mmchu
Copy link

mmchu commented Jan 13, 2021

I run pi.alert on a Raspberry Pi which has multiple network interfaces.

It would be good to have the ability to run arp-scan on multiple network interfaces so that I can capture responses from all of those networks. pi.alert already displays devices on all of these networks but some of them incorrectly show disconnected since arp-scan is missing them.
@pucherot pucherot self-assigned this Jan 14, 2021
@pucherot pucherot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 14, 2021
@pucherot
Copy link
Owner

Well, I will study this functionality.
Thank you

@pucherot pucherot mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2021
Closed
@jokob-sk
Copy link

Available in this fork now: https://github.com/jokob-sk/Pi.Alert/

@4Arthur2
Copy link

I've the same Issue. I can run with ARP-SCAN both, one by one successfully but I wasn't able to put more in the pialert.conf.
If I use more than one SCAN_SUBNETS string, only the last will be choosen.
If I put all subnets in one Line, I get only the results from eth0.
is it possible, to configute multiple interfaces in the pialert.conf?

Best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pucherot pucherot

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@mmchu @pucherot @jokob-sk @4Arthur2